A big thanks to all of the working group members for their input, work, time and problem solving efforts. These reports are the work of the respective working groups and were submitted to the Mighty Peace Waterhshed Alliance's Board of Directors for review. The Board of Directors received and reviewed these reports with their broad sector perspectives and used these reports to inform the DRAFT Integrated Watershed Management Plan for the Peace and Slave Watershed.
Come to the Annual General Meeting for the Public Release of the Draft Integrated Watershed Management Plan. It is Draft because we are still looking for feedback and welcome any comments. Copies will be made available starting at the AGM.
Here are some of the places that we are out talking about our water resources.
Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers Water Policy Group - March 27, 2017
Alberta Environment and Parks staff - January 30, 2017
Bigstone Cree Nation and MD of Opportunity - January 25, 2017 in Wabasca
Water North Coaltion - January 19, 2017 in Valleyview
North Peace Tribal Council - January 12, 2017 in Fort Vermilion
Wapiti Area Synergy Partnership - December 13, 2016 7-9 pm at Helen E. Taylor School in Wembley
Google group: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/wapitiasp
Grimshaw Gravels Aquifer Management Advisory Association - December 9, 2016
High Level - November 29, 2016
MPWA is interested in better understanding our groundwater resources and fostering proactive management. This working group is exploring our non-saline groundwater (fresh water in the ground) resources. Understanding these resources is the first step to identifying needs, risks and potential solutions.
Graphic credit: Alberta Geological Survey
|Integrated Watershed Management Plan Steering Committee||Richard Keillor|
|North Peace Tribal Council||Henry Francis|
|Grimshaw Gravels Aquifer Management Advisory Association||Cheryl Anderson|
|Municipality using Groundwater||Roy Dell|
|Alberta Geological Survey||Brian Smerdon|
|Alberta Environment and Parks||Scott Klasens|
|Agriculture and Forestry||Dan Benson|
|Oil and Gas||Deanna Cottrell|
|Rural Municipality||Bill Kostiw|
|First Nation||Tom Greene|
The MPWA is looking at Peace River Flow Regime to assess management options to enhance the flood dynamics of
the Peace-Athabasca Delta and Lower Peace Wetlands that are flood dependent. Positive and negative implications for the upstream portions are to be considered in relation to any proposed
changes in flow regime, including effects on ice bridges.
Photo credit: pademp.com
|Working Group Seat||Name|
|Integrated Watershed Management Plan Steering Committee||Bob Cameron|
|Parks Canada||Stuart MacMillan|
|First Nation (outside of Wood Buffalo National Park)||Jim Webb|
|Non-Governmental Organization||Alisha Mody|
|First Nation member of Peace-Athabasca Delta Ecological Monitoring Program||Jeff Dixon|
|Trans-boundary Secretariat||Carmen de la Chevrotiere|
|Upper Watershed First Nation||Tom Cardinal|
|Rural Municipality||Ray Toews|
|Recreational user||James Tupper|
This video provides an overview of the Bow River Phosphorus Management Plan. It gives a sense of the components that go into a multi-stakeholder watershed management like the Integrated Watershed Management Plan that we are working on for the Peace and Slave Watersheds.
We are starting to flesh out how to move forward on 2 identified Issues of Concern. The Board of Directors is working through recommendations from 2 working groups: 1) Water Quality, Availability and Consumptive Use and 2) Wetlands and Wetlands loss. As part of the process to refine the recommendations from the working groups the Board has produced a discussion paper. This is not an exhaustive examination of topic, but just a sampler to get the converstation going so that we can have discussions with those through the watershed. So please take a look and let us know what you think.
Now that the first edition of the State of the Watershed Report for the Peace and Slave Watersheds has been completed, the next step is to consider how we share our water resources and put that into a formal plan. The Integrated Watershed Management Plan will be combined with other plans in the Peace and Slave Watersheds and bring together those who live, work and play in the watershed to figure out the best way forward.
The Plan’s full Terms of Reference can be downloaded here. It lays out the entire planning process, including its vision, purpose and objectives, the roles and responsibilities of those overseeing development of the Plan, and the scientific and social contexts that will help shape the Plan. Each element is summarized on this site.
Below is our schedule.
Hover over a flag for information on each step of the process.
Stakeholder engagement is integral to the development of the Plan and is an opportunity for the MPWA to explain the importance and direction of this work. Equally important is the opportunity for stakeholders to provide input and comment on the IWMP.
The main stem of the Peace River is about 1,923 kilometres in length. The river stretches from the head of the Finlay River, in the Rocky Mountains of British Columbia, to where
it meets the Slave River in northeastern Alberta. In turn, the Peace River watershed is a sub-basin of the larger Mackenzie Basin. The Slave River flows from the Peace-Athabasca Delta in Alberta
into the North West Territories where it empties the flows of the Peace River, Athabasca River and Lake Athabasca into Great Slave Lake.
Hover over the numbers for details on significant elements of the watershed.
Today, the land cover of the Peace and Slave watersheds is often described using the National Ecological Framework, which combines climate, landforms, soils and plants. Areas that contain similar associations of these components are grouped in progressively more detailed categories. The broadest is the Natural Region, which is sufficient to provide an overview of the character of the Peace and Slave watershed.
Hover over a region at right for a description of the ecology and geology.
The watershed can also be divided into basins, or sub-watersheds: These include three sub-basins that make up the mainstem of the river (Upper, Central and Lower Peace), two for its major tributaries (Smoky-Wapiti and Wabasca rivers) and one for that portion of the Slave River that is in Alberta.
According to the 2011 census, some 165,000 people live in the Peace and Slave watershed. Grande Prairie, with a population of slightly more than 55,000, is the only city in the watershed and ranks as one of the fastest-growing in the province. Towns, villages, hamlets, Indian Reserves and Métis Settlements are scattered throughout the watershed.
Another 23% of the population lived in a town or village. About 6% of the population lived on an Indian reserve. The remainder (37%) lived in rural parts of the watershed.
The most relevant piece of policy for this Integrated Water Management Plan is the Water for Life strategy. There are a plethora of other plans, initiatives, policy, guidelines and legislation (see Appendix A) that are relevant in this watershed and as such will be considered by this plan. A few of the most relevant plans, strategies and legislation are the following:
Hover over segments for more information
The Integrated Watershed Management Plan of the Peace and Slave Watersheds balances and supports our social, environmental and economic objectives.
The purpose of this plan is to address effective and sustainable management and use of the water resources. It will also address the maintenance of other benefits provided by the ecological functioning of the watershed. Ensuring that cumulative effects are understood and communicated among all users of the watershed is necessary to improve decision-making about human activity in the watershed. Creation and implementation of this plan will support the achievement of Water for Life’s three main goals of: safe, secure drinking water; healthy aquatic ecosystems; and reliable, quality water supplies for a sustainable economy.
In the Integrated Plan, objectives refer to concrete recommendations for policy and planning related to the watershed issues of concern. These recommendations will be developed through a consensus process and draw on the sector(s) directly involved, as well as input from a broad cross-section of those who live, play and work in the Peace and Slave watersheds. Policy and planning recommendations will be supported by the development of an implementation strategy. This implementation strategy will be the roadmap for garnering support and encouraging decision-makers to implement the objectives of this plan.
The Mighty Peace Watershed Alliance Board of Directors will be responsible for and guide the process of the Plan. The Board can delegate responsibilities or duties to committees or consultants. Nevertheless, the final responsibility for the Plan lies with the Board of Directors. The board consists of all directors in good standing at the time. Consultants may be engaged by the board of directors as required. All consultants will be engaged through a Request for Proposals process and then vetted. Staff will support the Board of Directors in the creation of the Plan and fulfill those tasks assigned to them by the board or committees. All reporting eventually goes to the MPWA Board of Directors as they have responsibility for this project. Committees report directly to the Board at all Board meetings and between meetings as required.
To help validate the relevance and ensure the utility of this Integrated Watershed Management Plan, public participation will be achieved by means of 5 primary approaches:
Several workshops will be held to identify issues, put forth solutions and consider implementation. Workshops may be held either with a geographical focus in the watershed or specific to a sector.
This Plan will follow the guidelines laid out in the Guide to Watershed Management Planning in Alberta (2015) and where applicable the Guide to Water Management Planning in Alberta. This will ensure the greatest possibility of the Plan's approval by the Director and increase its reach. The Terms of Reference will be submitted to the Director.
Consistent with adaptive management principles, the Plan will be regularly reviewed on a 10-year cycle. The Plan will be assessed for effectiveness and relevance and the results of this assessment will guide any necessary revisions. Integral to effective planning is appropriate, relevant and current information; as such the State of the Watershed will also be renewed regularly. The end of the planning cycle is 10 years.
Hover for more information on the steps
The success of the Plan can be measured by several performance indicators. One performance indicator is the approval of this Integrated Watershed Management Plan by the Director. Another performance indicator is the recognized support for the Plan from all the stakeholders identified by the working groups. The number of recommendations that are adopted is also a performance indicator. A final means of evaluating the success of this planning process will to be review the plans using the indicators identified in the State of the Watershed Report. Several approaches available to do this are listed at right.