Integrated Watershed Management Plan

A big thank-you to all the members of both the Water Quality, Availability and Consumptive Use working group and the Wetlands and Wetlands Loss working group!

Watch the narrated slideshow, browse the brochure or read the DRAFT Integrated Watershed Managment Plan and let us know what you think by November 15, 2017.

Download
DRAFT Integrated Watershed Management Plan
This is the DRAFT of our watershed plan. We are looking for input on it!
IWMP_170509-HIGHRES.pdf
Adobe Acrobat Document 19.0 MB
Download
Brochure for the DRAFT Integrated Watershed Management Plan
Let us know what you think!
IWMP_Brochure_web_april20.pdf
Adobe Acrobat Document 11.8 MB

Let us know what you think!

Note: Please fill out the fields marked with an asterisk.


Working Group Reports

A big thanks to all of the working group members for their input, work, time and problem solving efforts.  These reports are the work of the respective working groups and were submitted to the Mighty Peace Waterhshed Alliance's Board of Directors for review.  The Board of Directors received and reviewed these reports with their broad sector perspectives and used these reports to inform the DRAFT Integrated Watershed Management Plan for the Peace and Slave Watershed. 

Download
Report from the Wetlands and Wetlands Loss Working Group
MPWA Wetland WG Report - Final.pdf
Adobe Acrobat Document 2.0 MB
Download
Report from the Water Quality, Availability away from the Mainstem and Consumptive Use Working Group
MPWA WQ A CU Working Group Report - Fin
Adobe Acrobat Document 1.8 MB
Download
Report from the Peace River Flow Regime Working Group
MPWA Flow WG Report Final -Jan. 31.pdf
Adobe Acrobat Document 660.6 KB
Download
Report from the Non-Saline Groundwater Working Group
MPWA Groundwater WG Report Final - Jan.
Adobe Acrobat Document 1.0 MB

Come to the Annual General Meeting for the Public Release of the Draft Integrated Watershed Management Plan.  It is Draft because we are still looking for feedback and welcome any comments.  Copies will be made available starting at the AGM.


Watershed Management - Let's talk!

Here are some of the places that we are out talking about our water resources.

 

Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers Water Policy Group - March 27, 2017

Alberta Environment and Parks staff - January 30, 2017

Bigstone Cree Nation and MD of Opportunity - January 25, 2017 in Wabasca

Water North Coaltion - January 19, 2017 in Valleyview

North Peace Tribal Council - January 12, 2017 in Fort Vermilion

Wapiti Area Synergy Partnership - December 13, 2016 7-9 pm at Helen E. Taylor School in Wembley

Google group: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/wapitiasp

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Wapitiasp/

Grimshaw Gravels Aquifer Management Advisory Association - December 9, 2016

 

High Level - November 29, 2016


Working Groups are working

Non-saline Groundwater

MPWA is interested in better understanding our groundwater resources and fostering proactive management. This working group is exploring our non-saline groundwater (fresh water in the ground) resources.  Understanding these resources is the first step to identifying needs, risks and potential solutions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Graphic credit: Alberta Geological Survey

Seat Name
Integrated Watershed Management Plan Steering Committee Richard Keillor
North Peace Tribal Council Henry Francis
Grimshaw Gravels Aquifer Management Advisory Association Cheryl Anderson
Municipality using Groundwater Roy Dell
Alberta Geological Survey Brian Smerdon
Alberta Environment and Parks Scott Klasens
Agriculture and Forestry Dan Benson
Oil and Gas Deanna Cottrell
Mining Joe Hustler
Rural Municipality Bill Kostiw
First Nation Tom Greene
   

Peace River Flow Regime

The MPWA is looking at Peace River Flow Regime to assess management options to enhance the flood dynamics of the Peace-Athabasca Delta and Lower Peace Wetlands that are flood dependent.  Positive and negative implications for the upstream portions are to be considered in relation to any proposed changes in flow regime, including effects on ice bridges.
Photo credit: pademp.com 

Working Group Seat Name
 Integrated Watershed Management Plan Steering Committee Bob Cameron
Parks Canada Stuart MacMillan
First Nation (outside of Wood Buffalo National Park) Jim Webb
Non-Governmental Organization Alisha Mody
First Nation member of Peace-Athabasca Delta Ecological Monitoring Program Jeff Dixon
Trans-boundary Secretariat Carmen de la Chevrotiere
Upper Watershed First Nation Tom Cardinal
Rural Municipality Ray Toews
Recreational user James Tupper
   

Bow River Phosphorus Management Plan

This video provides an overview of the Bow River Phosphorus Management Plan. It gives a sense of the components that go into a multi-stakeholder watershed management like the Integrated Watershed Management Plan that we are working on for the Peace and Slave Watersheds.


Integrated Watershed Management Plan Discussion Paper

We are starting to flesh out how to move forward on 2 identified Issues of Concern.  The Board of Directors is working through recommendations from 2 working groups: 1) Water Quality, Availability and Consumptive Use and 2) Wetlands and Wetlands loss.  As part of the process to refine the recommendations from the working groups the Board has produced a discussion paper.  This is not an exhaustive examination of topic, but just a sampler to get the converstation going so that we can have discussions with those through the watershed.  So please take a look and let us know what you think.

Download
Peace and Slave Watershed Management Discussion Paper
Peace and Slave Watershed Management Dis
Adobe Acrobat Document 1.8 MB
Create your own user feedback survey

Integrated Watershed Management Plan

Now that the first edition of the State of the Watershed Report for the Peace and Slave Watersheds has been completed, the next step is to consider how we share our water resources and put that into a formal plan. The Integrated Watershed Management Plan will be combined with other plans in the Peace and Slave Watersheds and bring together those who live, work and play in the watershed to figure out the best way forward.

 

The Plan’s full Terms of Reference can be downloaded here. It lays out the entire planning process, including its vision, purpose and objectives, the roles and responsibilities of those overseeing development of the Plan, and the scientific and social contexts that will help shape the Plan. Each element is summarized on this site.

 

Below is our schedule.

Hover over a flag for information on each step of the process.


Stakeholder Engagement

Stakeholder engagement is integral to the development of the Plan and is an opportunity for the MPWA to explain the importance and direction of this work. Equally important is the opportunity for stakeholders to provide input and comment on the IWMP.

  • Association of Alberta Forest Management Professionals - April 4, 2016
  • Mackenzie Municipal Services Agency - August 26, 2016
  • Northern Alberta Elected Leaders - October 14, 2016
  • High Level Forests Public Advisory Committee - November 29, 2016

 

Biophysical Context of the Plan

The main stem of the Peace River is about 1,923 kilometres in length. The river stretches from the head of the Finlay River, in the Rocky Mountains of British Columbia, to where it meets the Slave River in northeastern Alberta. In turn, the Peace River watershed is a sub-basin of the larger Mackenzie Basin. The Slave River flows from the Peace-Athabasca Delta in Alberta into the North West Territories where it empties the flows of the Peace River, Athabasca River and Lake Athabasca into Great Slave Lake.

Hover over the numbers for details on significant elements of the watershed.


Land Cover

Today, the land cover of the Peace and Slave watersheds is often described using the National Ecological Framework, which combines climate, landforms, soils and plants. Areas that contain similar associations of these components are grouped in progressively more detailed categories. The broadest is the Natural Region, which is sufficient to provide an overview of the character of the Peace and Slave watershed. 

 

Hover over a region at right for a description of the ecology and geology. 

 

 

The watershed can also be divided into basins, or sub-watersheds: These include three sub-basins that make up the mainstem of the river (Upper, Central and Lower Peace), two for its major tributaries (Smoky-Wapiti and Wabasca rivers) and one for that portion of the Slave River that is in Alberta. 

 

 


Socio-economic Context of the Plan

 

According to the 2011 census, some 165,000 people live in the Peace and Slave watershed. Grande Prairie, with a population of slightly more than 55,000, is the only city in the watershed and ranks as one of the fastest-growing in the province. Towns, villages, hamlets, Indian Reserves and Métis Settlements are scattered throughout the watershed. 

 

Another 23% of the population lived in a town or village. About 6% of the population lived on an Indian reserve. The remainder (37%) lived in rural parts of the watershed.


Policy and Legislative Context

The most relevant piece of policy for this Integrated Water Management Plan is the Water for Life strategy. There are a plethora of other plans, initiatives, policy, guidelines and legislation (see Appendix A) that are relevant in this watershed and as such will be considered by this plan. A few of the most relevant plans, strategies and legislation are the following:

  • Water Act (R.S.A. 2000, c. W-3)
  • Water for Life
  • Land Use Framework
  • Mackenzie River Basin Transboundary Waters Master Agreement
  • Mackenzie River Basin Bilateral Water Management Agreement
  • Canada National Parks Act (S.C. 2000, c. 32)
  • Mackenzie River Basin Transboundary Waters Master Agreement 
  • Mackenzie River Basin Bilateral Water Management Agreement 
  • Canada National Parks Act (S.C. 2000, c. 32)  

Water for Life

Hover over segments for more information


Vision, Purposes and Objectives

Vision

The Integrated Watershed Management Plan of the Peace and Slave Watersheds balances and supports our social, environmental and economic objectives.

 

Purposes

The purpose of this plan is to address effective and sustainable management and use of the water resources. It will also address the maintenance of other benefits provided by the ecological functioning of the watershed. Ensuring that cumulative effects are understood and communicated among all users of the watershed is necessary to improve decision-making about human activity in the watershed. Creation and implementation of this plan will support the achievement of Water for Life’s three main goals of: safe, secure drinking water; healthy aquatic ecosystems; and reliable, quality water supplies for a sustainable economy.

 

Objectives

In the Integrated Plan, objectives refer to concrete recommendations for policy and planning related to the watershed issues of concern. These recommendations will be developed through a consensus process and draw on the sector(s) directly involved, as well as input from a broad cross-section of those who live, play and work in the Peace and Slave watersheds. Policy and planning recommendations will be supported by the development of an implementation strategy. This implementation strategy will be the roadmap for garnering support and encouraging decision-makers to implement the objectives of this plan.

 

Management

The Mighty Peace Watershed Alliance Board of Directors will be responsible for and guide the process of the Plan. The Board can delegate responsibilities or duties to committees or consultants. Nevertheless, the final responsibility for the Plan lies with the Board of Directors. The board consists of all directors in good standing at the time. Consultants may be engaged by the board of directors as required. All consultants will be engaged through a Request for Proposals process and then vetted. Staff will support the Board of Directors in the creation of the Plan and fulfill those tasks assigned to them by the board or committees. All reporting eventually goes to the MPWA Board of Directors as they have responsibility for this project. Committees report directly to the Board at all Board meetings and between meetings as required.

 

Public Input

To help validate the relevance and ensure the utility of this Integrated Watershed Management Plan, public participation will be achieved by means of 5 primary approaches: 

  • Education and Awareness – this is a general push to make those in the watershed aware of the watershed, our shared uses of it, the need for a management plan and opportunities for input. 
  • Guided review and discussion 
  • Open forum – opportunities for questions and non-directed discussion 
  • Social media – to engage all possible residents in a digital fashion using platforms such as Twitter and Facebook 
  • Aboriginal community engagement - will be asked how they would like to participate. 

Several workshops will be held to identify issues, put forth solutions and consider implementation. Workshops may be held either with a geographical focus in the watershed or specific to a sector.

 

 

ISSUES OF CONCERN


Non-saline ground water
The quantity and the quality of non-saline groundwater for human consumption and other uses

Water quality and availability away from the mainstem
Sustainability of reliable drinking water sources for small communities along the tributaries and the functioning of aquatic ecosystems.

Wetlands and wetland loss
The level of understanding of the role and values of wetlands in the watershed

Peace River flow regime
The Peace River Flow Regime and hydrograph

Consumptive use of fresh water (ground & surface water)
Industrial use of water in the context of human consumption needs and aquatic ecosystem health

Evaluation and Approval

This Plan will follow the guidelines laid out in the Guide to Watershed Management Planning in Alberta (2015) and where applicable the Guide to Water Management Planning in Alberta. This will ensure the greatest possibility of the Plan's approval by the Director and increase its reach. The Terms of Reference will be submitted to the Director.

  

 

Consistent with adaptive management principles, the Plan will be regularly reviewed on a 10-year cycle. The Plan will be assessed for effectiveness and relevance and the results of this assessment will guide any necessary revisions. Integral to effective planning is appropriate, relevant and current information; as such the State of the Watershed will also be renewed regularly. The end of the planning cycle is 10 years.

Hover for more information on the steps


The Goal

 
The success of the Plan can be measured by several performance indicators. One performance indicator is the approval of this Integrated Watershed Management Plan by the Director. Another performance indicator is the recognized support for the Plan from all the stakeholders identified by the working groups. The number of recommendations that are adopted is also a performance indicator. A final means of evaluating the success of this planning process will to be review the plans using the indicators identified in the State of the Watershed Report. Several approaches available to do this are listed at right.

  1. Statistically significant – have the indicators changed in a way that is statistically significant (this is the most rigorous approach)? 
  2. Biologically significant – are there changes in the indicator (e.g., fish community) that are noticeable but not statistically significant? 
  3. Environmentally significant - has there been a change in the environment that affects the indicator (e.g.., an improvement in dissolved oxygen for fish communities)? 
  4. Socially significant – are there changes in the societal values and their availability to those in the watershed (maybe there is no counts of increased visits to a lake but anecdotally people are going there more)? 
  5. Economically significant – is there a change to the economic costs of implementation (is the Plan providing cost-effective ways of improving and maintaining watershed function)?

Integrated Watershed Management Plan Terms of Reference

Download
IWMP TOR
The Terms of Reference for the Integrated Watershed Management Plan layout the scope and direction for the plan. This Terms of Reference was submitted to the Director September 2015.
IWMP TOR 18.9.15.pdf
Adobe Acrobat Document 1.6 MB